How many Ruby hackers does it take to change a lightbulb?

Fifty:

One to post an issue to the redmine about the lights being out.
One to write a patch for the issue.
One to oppose the patch because the new lightbulb does not have a good name.
Three to propose better names.
Five to discuss the names but they does not reach any agreement.
One to point out that the lights is still out, three months later.
One to propose another name on ruby-dev.
Ten to discuss the names on ruby-dev.
One to translate the discussion into English.
One to point out that some names are not natural as English.
Twelve to discuss again on ruby-core.
Three to comment about the discussion at #ruby@WIDE:*.jp
One to make a commit.
One to complain that the committed patch broke Ruby on win32.
One to fix the problem on win32.
One to report that the redmine overlooked a mail and that because of it the issue was not automatically closed.
One to close the issue.
One to tweet that she wants to fix the redmine someday.
Four to backport the patches into active branches.
None to write rdoc.